The ties that bind

On his tour through Africa, President Hu Jintao stopped in Mauritius where he spoke at the Chinese Culture Center and emphasized the salience of 'cultural exchanges' between the two countries (and arguably Africa more broadly) in fostering friendly and beneficial relations:

“Learning Chinese will pave the way for better exchanges between Chinese and Mauritian people,” he said.

The Chinese Center in Mauritius is the first of such Chinese ventures (or so the article claims; I hesitate to believe that wholeheartedly). There, eager members can learn Chinese martial arts, dance, and language. Chinese language has also become part of the curricular framework in Mauritius. Goodness: if that doesn't drive home the growing importance of China for Africa, then I don't know what does!

To be perfectly honest, I don't quite know what to think about such overt emphasis on Chinese culture in Africa. On the one hand, it most certainly is useful. Much of the reason that Chinese firms in Africa hire their fellow compatriots is precisely because of the language barrier with locals. Similarly, when they are hired, local workers generally remain confined to manual labor positions with little opportunity for upward mobility. If you can't speak the language then what's the point, right?  Given that Chinese continue to stream into the continent at an astounding rate, a 'cultural exchange' of sort does seem like a logical enterprise. 

Yet two things bother me. First, I haven't heard any African leaders calling for such cultural exchanges. I mean, really calling for them; not just doing so because the Chinese are. I could be wrong and there may well be some who do, but I'm personally not aware of any. For now, the stress on Chinese culture comes from - *gasp* - the Chinese! It wouldn't behoove them to learn about the various African cultures, I suppose? Secondly, is it just me or does all of this ring of colonialism? The imposition of socio-cultural, religious and linguistic structures on an indigenous people? It's all a bit too familiar.

So today's million dollar question: cultural exchanges - friend or foe?

And that's a wrap

Much of the hype surrounding China's Charter '08 - a democracy manifesto calling for reform of the Chinese political system - has seemingly died. It caught nearly no attention in Western media outlets (sadly), and after its initial erratic reaction, the CCP seemingly forgot all about it, too (seemingly, being the operative word here). I guess there won't be much of a grassroots rebellion, after all. 

What the Charter did, do, however, was to spark interesting debate among both Chinese and Western scholars on the future of Chinese politics. Here,  Xujun Eberlein offers an interesting summary of the buzz surrounding the Charter. Apparently, it even caught the attention of the Falun Gong:

More curious, and changing, reactions, came from Falun Gong, or FLG, a religious and political group that has been banned in mainlandChina. A search on FLG's Chinese language website Sunday came up with 100 links cheering "Charter 08," with titles such as "Reform Is Dead, Long Live Revolution!" However a click on any of those links gave only a blank page. Remnants of posts here and there indicate that FLG originally found "Charter 08" an exciting sign of the coming revolution and supported it whole-heartedly. Later, though, they made a 180 degree turn after the FLG leader deemed the manifesto not revolutionary enough, but rather a "ghost shadow" of the communist party

Be sure to read the comments section of the post too - it's nearly as fascinating as the post itself.